ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释性施特劳斯扎根理论×主题分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990 (Strauss & Corbin seminal text); interpretivist grounded theory consolidation 1990s–2000s2006
提出者Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin (Straussian procedures); interpretivist framing draws on Dilthey, Weber, and BlumerVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative theory-building approachMethod
开创性文献Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932517Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名Straussian GT (interpretivist), interpretivist grounded theory, Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, systematic grounded theoryTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关63
摘要Interpretive Straussian grounded theory combines the systematic coding procedures developed by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin with an interpretivist epistemological stance. It uses open, axial, and selective coding — structured around a paradigm model of conditions, actions, and consequences — to inductively build a substantive theory from qualitative data, while acknowledging that the researcher actively constructs meaning rather than discovering pre-existing facts.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive Straussian grounded theory · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare