ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释性定性内容分析×解释性话语分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2005 (interpretive strand formalised); qualitative content analysis roots in the 1980s–1990s1980s–1990s
提出者Hsiu-Fang Hsieh & Sarah E. Shannon (conventional/interpretive strand); Phillip Mayring (qualitative content analysis generally)Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others
类型Qualitative analytic approachQualitative interpretive research approach
开创性文献Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. DOI ↗Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343
别名conventional content analysis, inductive qualitative content analysis, interpretive QCA, IQCAIDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis
相关56
摘要Interpretive qualitative content analysis (also called conventional content analysis) is a qualitative approach to systematically analysing text in which coding categories emerge directly from the data rather than from a pre-defined coding scheme. The researcher immerses themselves in the material, derives codes inductively through close reading, groups those codes into interpretive categories, and constructs a conceptual account of the content's meaning. It is especially suited to domains where existing theory is sparse and the aim is to understand how participants describe or make sense of a phenomenon.Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive qualitative content analysis · Interpretive Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare