方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 解释性多案例研究× | 解释性扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s (Yin 1984; Stake 1995, 2006) | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study design); Robert E. Stake (collective/interpretive case study) | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research methodology |
| 开创性文献≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 别名 | multi-site interpretive case study, collective case study, interpretive multi-case design, constructivist multiple case study | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Interpretive multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher studies two or more bounded cases in depth, using an interpretivist stance to understand how participants construct meaning within each setting. Rather than seeking law-like generalizations, it aims to generate rich, context-sensitive understanding that is then compared across cases to reveal patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights. | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|