方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 解释性隐喻分析× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative interpretive analysis | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|