ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释性隐喻分析×解释性内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure)1983 (Mayring's German original); 2000 (English publication)
提出者Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theoryPhilipp Mayring (systematic qualitative variant); Klaus Krippendorff (foundational framework)
类型Qualitative interpretive analysisQualitative text analysis approach
开创性文献Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗
别名IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysisICA, interpretive CA, qualitative content analysis, meaning-oriented content analysis
相关66
摘要Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames.Interpretive content analysis is a systematic qualitative approach for analyzing the latent meanings and interpretive frameworks embedded in textual, visual, or documentary data. Unlike frequency-based content analysis, it foregrounds the researcher's interpretive engagement with texts to uncover how meaning is constructed, contested, or reproduced. Philipp Mayring's qualitative content analysis and broader interpretive traditions provide the methodological backbone for this approach.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive Metaphor Analysis · Interpretive content analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare