方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 解释性批判话语分析× | 解释性内容分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1983 (Mayring's German original); 2000 (English publication) |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions) | Philipp Mayring (systematic qualitative variant); Klaus Krippendorff (foundational framework) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative discourse analysis design | Qualitative text analysis approach |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126 | Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗ |
| 别名 | interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist | ICA, interpretive CA, qualitative content analysis, meaning-oriented content analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent. | Interpretive content analysis is a systematic qualitative approach for analyzing the latent meanings and interpretive frameworks embedded in textual, visual, or documentary data. Unlike frequency-based content analysis, it foregrounds the researcher's interpretive engagement with texts to uncover how meaning is constructed, contested, or reproduced. Philipp Mayring's qualitative content analysis and broader interpretive traditions provide the methodological backbone for this approach. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|