ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释性内容分析×叙事探究×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1983 (Mayring's German original); 2000 (English publication)2000
提出者Philipp Mayring (systematic qualitative variant); Klaus Krippendorff (foundational framework)D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly
类型Qualitative text analysis approachMethod
开创性文献Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. link ↗Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗
别名ICA, interpretive CA, qualitative content analysis, meaning-oriented content analysisNarrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method
相关63
摘要Interpretive content analysis is a systematic qualitative approach for analyzing the latent meanings and interpretive frameworks embedded in textual, visual, or documentary data. Unlike frequency-based content analysis, it foregrounds the researcher's interpretive engagement with texts to uncover how meaning is constructed, contested, or reproduced. Philipp Mayring's qualitative content analysis and broader interpretive traditions provide the methodological backbone for this approach.Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive content analysis · Narrative Inquiry. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare