ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释建构主义扎根理论×建构主义扎根理论×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000–20062000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
提出者Kathy CharmazKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
类型Qualitative research design and analytic approachQualitative research method
开创性文献Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029140Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
别名constructivist GT, interpretive CGT, Charmaz grounded theory, constructivist grounded theoryCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
相关66
摘要Interpretive constructivist grounded theory is a qualitative research design in which the researcher and participants are understood as jointly constructing meaning, and theory is built inductively from data through systematic comparative analysis. Developed by Kathy Charmaz as a departure from the positivist assumptions of classic grounded theory, this approach situates both the researcher and participants as active interpreters whose social positions, values, and interactions shape the categories and theory that emerge from the study.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive Constructivist Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare