ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

诠释性经典扎根理论×经典扎根理论×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (classic GT); interpretivist epistemological framing: mid-1990s onward1967
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); interpretivist framing elaborated by Merilyn Annells and othersBarney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss
类型Qualitative theory-building methodQualitative research method
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗
别名interpretivist CGT, interpretivist classic GT, interpretive Glaserian grounded theory, interpretive emergent grounded theoryGlaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT
相关66
摘要Interpretive classic grounded theory applies Glaser and Strauss's original discovery-oriented grounded theory procedures under an explicitly interpretivist epistemology. It retains classic GT's commitment to theory emergence — avoiding forced conceptual frameworks — while acknowledging that the researcher's interpretive lens shapes what is noticed and how meaning is constructed from data. This stance distinguishes it from purely objectivist readings of Glaser's later solo work and from constructivist grounded theory in its degree of inductive openness.Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive classic grounded theory · Classic Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare