ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

诠释性自体民族志×Braun & Clarke 的反思性主题分析法×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提出者Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (evocative strand); Leon Anderson (analytic/interpretive strand)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative self-study designQualitative research method
开创性文献Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名interpretive autoethnography, evocative autoethnography, analytic autoethnography, IAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
相关66
摘要Interpretive autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher uses systematic analysis of their own lived experience as the primary data source, moving beyond evocative personal narrative to connect personal meaning with broader cultural, social, or theoretical frameworks. Drawing on Leon Anderson's analytic strand and building on Ellis and Bochner's foundational work, it treats the researcher's self-account as both evidence and interpretive lens, subjecting personal stories to disciplined ethnographic and theoretical scrutiny to generate insights that extend beyond the individual case.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interpretive autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare