ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

内部控制评价×欺诈风险评估×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19922002
提出者The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
类型Comprehensive control evaluation frameworkFraud risk assessment and audit procedure framework
开创性文献The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
别名COSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control AssessmentFraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud Assessment
相关44
摘要Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Internal Control Evaluation · Fraud Risk Assessment. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare