ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

群体间接触量表×社会凝聚力量表×
领域政治社会学政治社会学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1954–20081997–2006
提出者Gordon Allport, Thomas Pettigrew, Linda TroppRobert Sampson, Ray Forrest, Akhtar Kearns
类型Self-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
开创性文献Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. link ↗Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924. DOI ↗
别名ICS, Contact Quality IndexSCS, Social Integration Index
相关55
摘要The Intergroup Contact Scale measures the quantity and quality of face-to-face interaction between members of different social groups (racial, ethnic, religious, national, or other categories). Rooted in Gordon Allport's contact hypothesis (1954), which proposed that prejudice decreases when groups interact under favorable conditions, the scale is fundamental in research on prejudice reduction, integration, and intergroup relations.The Social Cohesion Scale measures the degree to which members of a community feel integrated, connected, and unified by shared values and mutual support. Developed across multiple traditions—notably by Robert Sampson and colleagues in criminology and urban sociology, and by Forrest & Kearns in housing research—it assesses both the structural glue (institutions, networks) and affective bonds (belonging, solidarity) that hold communities together.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Intergroup Contact Scale · Social Cohesion Scale. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare