方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 机构信任量表× | 民主价值观量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 政治社会学 | 政治社会学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975–2011 | 1999–2015 |
| 提出者≠ | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|