方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 机构信任量表× | 公民参与量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 政治社会学 | 政治社会学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1975–2011 | 1995–2008 |
| 提出者≠ | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris | Cliff Zukin, Scott Keeter, Russell Dalton |
| 类型≠ | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire / Behavioral frequency |
| 开创性文献≠ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ | Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index | CES, Political Participation Scale |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. | The Civic Engagement Scale measures the extent and type of an individual's participation in civic, political, and community life. Rather than a single construct, it typically encompasses multiple dimensions: electoral participation (voting), political activity (contacting officials, campaign involvement), civic service (volunteering, organizational membership), and social participation (community meetings, neighborhood involvement). Developed by scholars including Zukin, Keeter, and Dalton, it captures how citizens actualize their democratic role. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|