ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

体内编码×现象学×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (grounded theory origins); widely codified as a distinct method from the 1990s onwardEarly 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927)
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (grounded theory tradition); systematised and named by Johnny SaldañaEdmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic)
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative research approach
开创性文献Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1529731743Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466
别名verbatim coding, literal coding, first-cycle in vivo coding, indigenous codingFenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis
相关66
摘要In vivo coding is a qualitative first-cycle coding strategy in which the researcher uses the participants' own words or short phrases verbatim as code labels, rather than imposing researcher-generated or theoretical language. The technique preserves the voice, meaning, and conceptual priorities of participants, making it especially valuable in grounded theory, phenomenology, and any study where honouring the emic (insider) perspective is central to analytic integrity.Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: In Vivo Coding · Phenomenology. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare