ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

深度访谈×主题分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward)2006
提出者Rooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. RubinVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Qualitative research methodMethod
开创性文献Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名IDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interviewTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关63
摘要The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: In-Depth Interview · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare