ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

客观评价标准权重集成确定法×组合折衷解×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20122019
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Integrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要IDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: IDOCRIW · COCOSO. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare