ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Ideological Constraint Analysis×Political Ideology Scaling×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19641985
提出者Philip E. ConverseKeith Poole & Howard Rosenthal
类型Belief-system structure analysisLatent ideal-point model
开创性文献Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press. ISBN: 9780029006702Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357-384. DOI ↗
别名Belief System Constraint, Attitude Constraint Analysis, Issue Consistency AnalysisNOMINATE, Ideal Point Estimation, IRT Ideology Scaling, Spatial Voting Scaling
相关44
摘要Ideological constraint analysis measures the degree to which an individual's or a public's political attitudes hang together in a coherent, predictable structure, the extent to which knowing a person's position on one issue lets you predict their positions on others. Introduced by Converse (1964) as the defining feature of a belief system, it is assessed through inter-item correlations, factor/latent-dimension models, and constraint indices.Political ideology scaling estimates actors' positions on one or more latent ideological dimensions from their observed choices, most often legislators' roll-call votes, but also survey responses and donations. The dominant methods are Poole and Rosenthal's NOMINATE (1985) and the Bayesian item-response-theory (IRT) approach of Clinton, Jackman and Rivers (2004), which place legislators and the proposals they vote on in a common spatial map.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ideological Constraint Analysis · Political Ideology Scaling. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare