ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Ideal Point Estimation×Wordfish×
领域Political Science心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份20042008
提出者Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)Jonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia Proksch
类型Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice dataGenerative text model for dimension reduction
开创性文献Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗
别名Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
相关45
摘要Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.Wordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ideal Point Estimation · Wordfish. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare