ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Ideal Point Estimation×Roll-Call Analysis×
领域Political SciencePolitical Science
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份2004
提出者Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)Spatial-voting tradition; Poole, Rosenthal, Clinton, Jackman, Rivers
类型Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice dataScaling and analysis of legislative binary-choice data
开创性文献Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗Poole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237. link ↗
别名Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal pointsRoll call voting analysis, Legislative vote scaling, Roll-call scaling, Optimal classification of votes
相关43
摘要Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.Roll-call analysis is the study of recorded legislative votes to recover the structure of political conflict — the ideological positions of legislators, the dimensionality of the issue space, and the cohesion of parties. It encompasses parametric spatial and item-response models that estimate latent ideal points, nonparametric scaling such as optimal classification that maximizes correctly classified votes without distributional assumptions, and descriptive cohesion statistics like the Rice index. Together these tools turn a matrix of yea/nay votes into a map of who agrees with whom and why.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ideal Point Estimation · Roll-Call Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare