ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

HRAF 跨文化分析×个体最小数量×
领域考古学考古学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671953
提出者George MurdockTheodore White
类型Ethnographic comparisonFaunal quantification method
开创性文献Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentages of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 19(4), 396-398. DOI ↗
别名cross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnographyMNI method, minimum individual number
相关24
摘要HRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.Minimum number of individuals (MNI) is a quantitative zooarchaeological method that estimates the minimum number of animals represented in a faunal assemblage based on the frequency of unique skeletal elements. Developed by Theodore White in 1953, it is one of the most widely used techniques for analyzing animal bone assemblages from archaeological sites. The MNI method helps archaeologists understand hunting and butchering patterns, interpret subsistence practices, and assess the diversity of fauna exploited by past human populations.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: HRAF Cross-Cultural Analysis · Minimum Number of Individuals. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare