ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

犹豫模糊TOPSIS(含可选的不完整权重信息)(Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20131995
提出者Xu, Z., Zhang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Distance-to-ideal ranking (Hwang-Yoon 1981) extended to Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE ⊂ [0,1]) via the hesitant normalised Euclidean distance d_1 (Xu-Xia 2011b); supports three weight-information modes: fully specified, completely unknown (Eq.(22) maximizing deviation closed-form), and partly known (Model M-2 linear programme).Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Xu, Z., Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要HF-TOPSIS (Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS with optional incomplete weight information (Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, Z., Zhang, X. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: HF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare