ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (基于平均解距离的评估)×标准差法 (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20182016
提出者Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space)Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
类型Hesitant outranking/ranking — Triangular Fuzzy Hesitant Fuzzy Set (TFHFS, Yu 2014): each cell is a finite set of triangular fuzzy numbers in [0,1]^3Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
开创性文献Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C., Civan, H. N. (2018). A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要HF-EDAS (Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space) in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: HF-EDAS · CILOS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare