ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

异质性处理效应倾向得分匹配×匹配估计量×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983–20161973
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (PSM foundation, 1983); Athey & Imbens (HTE extensions, 2016)Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006)
类型Causal inference / matching with effect heterogeneityNonparametric matching / causal inference
开创性文献Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7353-7360. DOI ↗Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗
别名HTE-PSM, CATE via PSM, subgroup treatment effect matching, conditional average treatment effect matchingnearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matching
相关56
摘要Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Propensity Score Matching extends standard PSM to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it uses the matched sample to estimate conditional average treatment effects (CATE), revealing which types of units benefit most or least from a treatment.The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Propensity Score Matching · Matching Estimator. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare