方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 异质性处理效应倾向得分匹配× | 双重稳健估计（AIPW）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1983–2016 | 2005 |
| 提出者≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (PSM foundation, 1983); Athey & Imbens (HTE extensions, 2016) | Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins |
| 类型≠ | Causal inference / matching with effect heterogeneity | Semiparametric causal estimator |
| 开创性文献≠ | Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7353-7360. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | HTE-PSM, CATE via PSM, subgroup treatment effect matching, conditional average treatment effect matching | AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW) |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Propensity Score Matching extends standard PSM to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it uses the matched sample to estimate conditional average treatment effects (CATE), revealing which types of units benefit most or least from a treatment. | Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|