方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 异质处理效应面板事件研究× | 双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 计量经济学 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2021 | 1994 |
| 提出者≠ | Sun & Abraham; Callaway & Sant'Anna | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| 类型≠ | Causal inference / quasi-experimental | Causal inference / panel regression |
| 开创性文献≠ | Sun, L., & Abraham, S. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175-199. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| 别名≠ | HTE panel event study, heterogeneous effects event study, staggered panel event study, CATT event study | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | A heterogeneous treatment effect panel event study estimates how treatment impacts vary across units and over time in a panel setting, allowing each cohort of treated units to have its own dynamic response. Seminal contributions by Sun and Abraham (2021) and Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) showed that standard two-way fixed-effects event studies mask sign-reversing treatment heterogeneity across cohorts, motivating cohort-specific estimation followed by flexible aggregation. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|