方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 异质处理效应粗化精确匹配× | 倾向得分匹配× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 研究统计学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012-2013 | 1983 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); subgroup HTE extensions by Imai & colleagues | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| 类型≠ | Matching-based causal inference with subgroup CATE estimation | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | HTE-CEM, CEM with CATE estimation, subgroup CEM, coarsened exact matching with effect heterogeneity | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect coarsened exact matching (HTE-CEM) extends the coarsened exact matching framework to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. After CEM creates balanced strata by coarsening continuous covariates into bins and exactly matching units within each bin, conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are computed within or across these strata, revealing where treatment works, for whom, and by how much. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|