方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 异质处理效应粗化精确匹配× | 粗化精确匹配 (CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); subgroup HTE extensions by Imai & colleagues | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 类型≠ | Matching-based causal inference with subgroup CATE estimation | Matching / causal inference |
| 开创性文献 | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | HTE-CEM, CEM with CATE estimation, subgroup CEM, coarsened exact matching with effect heterogeneity | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect coarsened exact matching (HTE-CEM) extends the coarsened exact matching framework to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. After CEM creates balanced strata by coarsening continuous covariates into bins and exactly matching units within each bin, conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are computed within or across these strata, revealing where treatment works, for whom, and by how much. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|