ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

异质处理效应粗化精确匹配×粗化精确匹配 (CEM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2012-20132011-2012
提出者Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); subgroup HTE extensions by Imai & colleaguesIacus, King, & Porro
类型Matching-based causal inference with subgroup CATE estimationMatching / causal inference
开创性文献Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
别名HTE-CEM, CEM with CATE estimation, subgroup CEM, coarsened exact matching with effect heterogeneityCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
相关56
摘要Heterogeneous treatment effect coarsened exact matching (HTE-CEM) extends the coarsened exact matching framework to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. After CEM creates balanced strata by coarsening continuous covariates into bins and exactly matching units within each bin, conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are computed within or across these strata, revealing where treatment works, for whom, and by how much.Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Coarsened Exact Matching · Coarsened Exact Matching. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare