ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

解释学分析×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域田野方法质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969)Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul RicoeurNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Qualitative interpretive methodQualitative research method
开创性文献Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneuticsCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关66
摘要Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Hermeneutic Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare