方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 健康应用系统可用性量表× | 数字健康接受度量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 卫生信息学 | 卫生信息学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1996 | 1989 |
| 提出者≠ | John Brooke | Fred D. Davis (Technology Acceptance Model); extended by Venkatesh et al. (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Weerdmeester, A. Thomas, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-7484-0635-1 | Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | SUS-Health, System Usability Scale, SUS | DHAS, Digital Health Acceptance |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a rapid, validated tool for measuring perceived usability of digital products, widely adapted for health applications. Developed by John Brooke in 1996 and extensively validated by Bangor and colleagues, the 10-item SUS generates a single composite score reflecting users' subjective perception of ease of use, learnability, and overall system quality. Its simplicity and robustness have made it the de facto standard for usability assessment in health technology research. | The Digital Health Acceptance Scale measures the extent to which patients and providers perceive digital health technologies as useful, easy to use, and worth adopting. Grounded in Davis's Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and extended by Venkatesh and colleagues through the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the scale captures both intrinsic factors (usefulness, ease of use, subjective norms) and contextual factors (facilitating conditions, effort expectancy) that predict technology adoption and sustained use in healthcare settings. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|