方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| HCR-20v3：历史临床风险管理-20× | SAPROF：保护因素暴力风险结构化评估× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 司法心理学 | 司法心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2013 | 2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al. | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| 类型 | Clinician-rated | Clinician-rated |
| 开创性文献≠ | Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program. link ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| 别名 | HCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|