ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

灰EDAS×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20171995
提出者Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. (2017). An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: GREY-EDAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare