ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

灰EDAS×层次分析法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20171980
提出者Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z.Saaty, T. L.
类型Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
开创性文献Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. (2017). An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
别名
相关88
摘要GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: GREY-EDAS · AHP. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare