ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

GRADE证据评估:评估证据确定性和推荐强度×PRISMA清单:系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准×
领域研究方法论研究方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20082021 (original 2009)
提出者Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group)Page et al. (PRISMA Group)
类型Research team / Guideline panel assessmentSystematic review author reporting checklist
开创性文献Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗
别名GRADE, GRADE approachPRISMA, PRISMA 2020
相关44
摘要GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide.PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: GRADE Evidence Profiling · PRISMA Checklist. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare