ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

GRADE证据评估:评估证据确定性和推荐强度×CONSORT核查表:随机对照试验报告标准×
领域研究方法论研究方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20082010 (original 1996)
提出者Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group)Schulz et al. (CONSORT Group)
类型Research team / Guideline panel assessmentTrial author reporting checklist
开创性文献Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. The Lancet, 375(9721), 1657–1668. DOI ↗
别名GRADE, GRADE approachCONSORT, CONSORT 2010
相关44
摘要GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide.The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement is a 25-item evidence-based checklist and flow diagram developed to standardize reporting of parallel-group randomized controlled trials. First published in 1996 and updated in 2010 (CONSORT 2010), it is endorsed by over 600 journals including The Lancet, JAMA, and BMJ, and is mandatory or strongly recommended for RCT manuscript submission across clinical research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: GRADE Evidence Profiling · CONSORT Reporting Checklist. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare