方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| GRADE证据评估：评估证据确定性和推荐强度× | CASP 随机对照试验清单× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2008 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| 提出者≠ | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| 类型≠ | Research team / Guideline panel assessment | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| 别名 | GRADE, GRADE approach | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|