ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

持续经营能力评估×审计风险模型×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19881983
提出者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
类型Audit assessment and reporting frameworkProfessional auditing framework
开创性文献American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
别名Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationRisk-Based Audit Planning Model
相关34
摘要Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Going Concern Evaluation · Audit Risk Model. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare