ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

持续经营能力评估×审计中的分析程序×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19881983
提出者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
类型Audit assessment and reporting frameworkAudit procedure methodology
开创性文献American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
别名Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
相关34
摘要Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Going Concern Evaluation · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare