ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Giacomini-White 条件预测能力检验×模型置信集 (MCS)×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份20062011
提出者Raffaella Giacomini & Halbert WhiteHansen, Lunde & Nason
类型Non-nested forecast comparison testSequential hypothesis testing procedure for model comparison
开创性文献Giacomini, R., & White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica, 74(6), 1545–1578. DOI ↗Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Nason, J. M. (2011). The model confidence set. Econometrica, 79(2), 453–497. DOI ↗
别名GW Test, Conditional Predictive Ability Test, Giacomini-White CPA Test, Koşullu Tahmin Yeteneği TestiMCS Procedure, Superior Set of Models, Model Selection Confidence Set, Model Güven Kümesi
相关33
摘要The Giacomini-White (GW) test, introduced by Raffaella Giacomini and Halbert White in 2006, evaluates whether two competing forecasting methods have equal conditional predictive ability given information available at the time of forecast. Unlike unconditional tests such as the Diebold-Mariano test, it asks whether one method systematically outperforms the other in specific economic or market conditions, making it especially useful for practitioners who need state-dependent forecast comparisons.The Model Confidence Set (MCS) is a sequential hypothesis-testing procedure introduced by Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2011) that identifies the smallest collection of forecasting or predictive models statistically indistinguishable from the best-performing model at a given confidence level. Instead of selecting a single winner, MCS returns a set of superior models, making it especially valuable in econometric forecast comparisons where the true best model is unknown.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Giacomini-White Test · Model Confidence Set. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare