ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

几何形态学×使用磨损分析×
领域考古学考古学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19911980
提出者Fred BooksteinLawrence Keeley
类型Shape and form analysisTool function inference
开创性文献Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗
别名shape analysis, morphometric analysismicrowear, tool use analysis
相关44
摘要Geometric morphometrics is a quantitative analytical method that captures, analyzes, and compares the shapes of biological structures (bones, teeth, pottery) using coordinate data from landmarks and outlines. Developed by Fred Bookstein in the 1990s, GMM provides a rigorous statistical framework for studying shape variation across populations or time periods. The method allows archaeologists to quantify morphological differences between individuals, populations, or artifact classes with precision impossible using traditional linear measurements.Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Geometric Morphometrics · Use-Wear Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare