方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Gender Gap Decomposition× | Intersectionality Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Gender Studies | Gender Studies |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1973 | 1989 |
| 提出者≠ | Ronald Oaxaca & Alan Blinder | Kimberlé Crenshaw |
| 类型≠ | Regression-based decomposition of a mean group difference | Critical qualitative analytic framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709. DOI ↗ | Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition, Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition, Wage Gap Decomposition | Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Gender gap decomposition, most often implemented as the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, splits the mean difference in an outcome such as wages between men and women into a part explained by differences in measured characteristics (education, experience, occupation) and an unexplained residual part attributed to differences in how those characteristics are rewarded. Introduced independently by Ronald Oaxaca and Alan Blinder in 1973, it is the workhorse method for quantifying how much of the gender pay gap reflects composition versus differential treatment. | Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|