方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Gender-Equitable Men Scale× | Modern Sexism Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Gender Studies | Gender Studies |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2008 | 1995 |
| 提出者≠ | Julie Pulerwitz & Gary Barker | Janet K. Swim, Kathryn J. Aikin, Wayne S. Hall, and Barbara A. Hunter |
| 类型 | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report attitude scale |
| 开创性文献≠ | Pulerwitz, J., & Barker, G. (2008). Measuring attitudes toward gender norms among young men in Brazil: Development and psychometric evaluation of the GEM Scale. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 322–338. DOI ↗ | Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | GEM Scale, Gender Equitable Men Scale, GEMS | MSS, Swim Modern Sexism Scale, Neosexism |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Gender-Equitable Men (GEM) Scale is a 24-item self-report instrument developed by Julie Pulerwitz and Gary Barker in 2008 to measure attitudes toward gender norms, particularly among men. Created and first validated with young men in Brazil through the Instituto Promundo programme, it covers norms around sexual and reproductive health, sexual relationships, violence, domestic work and child care, and homophobia, and has become a leading tool for evaluating gender-transformative health and violence-prevention interventions worldwide. | The Modern Sexism Scale, developed by Janet Swim and colleagues in 1995, distinguishes between old-fashioned (blatant) sexism and modern (subtle) sexism, paralleling work on old-fashioned versus modern racism. The accompanying Old-Fashioned Sexism Scale captures openly endorsed beliefs in women's inferiority and prescribed traditional roles, while the Modern Sexism Scale captures covert sexism expressed through denial of continuing discrimination, antagonism toward women's demands, and resentment of policies perceived as special favours. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|