ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)×加权理想解点×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19832020
提出者Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D.
类型Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-basedIdeal solution proximity (four score components)
开创性文献Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.WISP (Weighted Ideal Solution Point) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FUZZY-AHP · WISP. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare