ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)×具有相等标准权重的备选方案排序×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19832024
提出者Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.Puška, A., Štilić, A., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Nedeljković, M.
类型Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-basedRank-based equal-weight aggregation with distance from ideal
开创性文献Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗Puška, A., Štilić, A., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Nedeljković, M. (2024). Introducing a Novel multi-criteria Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC) model. MethodsX DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.RAWEC (Ranking Alternatives With Equal Criteria weights) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Puška, A., Štilić, A., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Nedeljković, M. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FUZZY-AHP · RAWEC. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare