ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)×模糊TOPSIS (Chen-Hwang 1992)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19831992
提出者Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L.
类型Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-basedDistance-based ranking — Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number (TrFN: a, b, c, d) with Zadeh max-min similarity
开创性文献Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 375, Springer-Verlag, Berlin DOI ↗
别名
相关82
摘要FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.FUZZY-TOPSIS (Fuzzy TOPSIS (Chen-Hwang 1992) — Trapezoidal fuzzy TOPSIS with Zadeh sup-min similarity distance) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L. in 1992. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FUZZY-AHP · FUZZY-TOPSIS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare