ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

模糊层次分析法 (Fuzzy AHP)×模糊EDAS×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19832000
提出者Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.Chen, C. T.
类型Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-basedFuzzy outranking/ranking — Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u)
开创性文献Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗
别名
相关82
摘要FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.FUZZY-EDAS (Fuzzy EDAS — Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Chen, C. T. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FUZZY-AHP · FUZZY-EDAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare