ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

欺诈风险评估×内部控制评价×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20021992
提出者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
类型Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure frameworkComprehensive control evaluation framework
开创性文献American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
别名Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud AssessmentCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
相关44
摘要Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Fraud Risk Assessment · Internal Control Evaluation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare