ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

欺诈风险评估×审计中的分析程序×
领域会计学会计学
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20021983
提出者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
类型Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure frameworkAudit procedure methodology
开创性文献American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
别名Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud AssessmentAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
相关44
摘要Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Fraud Risk Assessment · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare