方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 福柯话语分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1960s–1970s (The Order of Things 1966; The Archaeology of Knowledge 1969; Discipline and Punish 1975) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Michel Foucault | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | FDA, Foucauldian analysis, genealogical discourse analysis, archaeological discourse analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language, texts, and social practices produce knowledge, construct subjects, and exercise power. Drawing on Michel Foucault's archaeological and genealogical frameworks, FDA investigates the historical and institutional conditions that make certain statements possible, acceptable, and 'true' while silencing others. It is widely applied in critical social science, health, education, and policy research to expose how dominant discourses shape what can be said, known, and done within a given social field. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|