ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

森林火灾风险评估×森林经营处方设计×
领域林学林学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1950s–2000s1950s–2000s
提出者Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire ecology research communitySmith, Larson, and classical silviculture
类型Assessment and modeling pipelinePlanning and decision pipeline
开创性文献Agee, J. K. (2000). The Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press. link ↗Smith, D. M., Larson, B. C., Kelty, M. J., & Ashton, P. M. S. (1997). The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
别名Wildfire risk assessment, Fire hazard mapping, Burn severity predictionSilvicultural prescription, Stand treatment planning, Forest management design
相关44
摘要Forest fire risk assessment quantifies the probability and potential severity of wildfire in forest ecosystems, integrating stand structure, fuel characteristics, weather patterns, and topography. Developed by Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire science communities, fire risk models predict fire ignition likelihood, fire behavior (spread rate, intensity), and consequences (area burned, damage extent). Essential for land management planning, community protection, and ecosystem conservation.Silvicultural treatment design is the process of developing specific management prescriptions for forest stands to achieve defined objectives (timber yield, biodiversity, carbon storage, watershed protection). Codified in foundational texts by Smith and colleagues, silvicultural design integrates stand assessment, growth models, and ecosystem understanding to specify interventions (thinning, shelterwood, clear-cut, rotation-age modification) that steer forest development toward intended outcomes while respecting ecological constraints.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Forest Fire Risk Assessment · Silvicultural Treatment Design. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare